Everything Open All at Once: Just how *Open* do we want *Everything* to be, really?
Plenary | Tue 21 Jan 11:40 a.m.–12:25 p.m.
Presented by
-
itgrrl
@π€π©ποΈπ₯π«π
ββ
https://itgrrl.com/
itgrrl is a π¦ *Senior Cyber Unicorn* π¦ who tries to make technologies less terrible. Her experience spans technical and management domains including cyber security, systems & networks, web dev, and IT management & service delivery. In her day job, she is focused on cyber security ("risk management with computers"), information privacy, and IT policy & governance. In her spare time, she enjoys reading privacy policies & legislation (no, really! π΄), tinkering with tech, stargazing, Star Trek π & Buffy (duh), musical theatre, and the occasional unexpected journey.
If youβd like to say hi, you can find itgrrl on Mastodon: π [@itgrrl@infosec.exchange](https://infosec.exchange/@itgrrl)
itgrrl
@π€π©ποΈπ₯π«π
ββ
https://itgrrl.com/
Abstract
Itβs no secret that people who attend an open source | software | hardware | data | government | access | technologies conference are interested in things beingβ¦ open. Itβs right there on the tin: βEverything Openβ. But what does it *really* mean for everything to be open?
Are we "open technology absolutists"? Is that a good thing? (Are we the baddies?)
What are the consequences, and for whom? Should we care?
Can we balance right to repair / right to tinker and safety in cyber-physical systems?
Is this a zero-sum game or can everyone "win"?
This talk will explore and interrogate some of the spoken and unspoken assumptions that permeate the open $everything community, and will encourage open source technologists to think deeply about the impact on the world of the technologies that they create, extend, deploy, support, and use.
Itβs no secret that people who attend an open source | software | hardware | data | government | access | technologies conference are interested in things beingβ¦ open. Itβs right there on the tin: βEverything Openβ. But what does it *really* mean for everything to be open? Are we "open technology absolutists"? Is that a good thing? (Are we the baddies?) What are the consequences, and for whom? Should we care? Can we balance right to repair / right to tinker and safety in cyber-physical systems? Is this a zero-sum game or can everyone "win"? This talk will explore and interrogate some of the spoken and unspoken assumptions that permeate the open $everything community, and will encourage open source technologists to think deeply about the impact on the world of the technologies that they create, extend, deploy, support, and use.